cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6282111929912
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.bpk@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Gatot Subroto Kav 31 Jakarta Pusat 10210
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara
Published by Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI
ISSN : 24603937     EISSN : 2549452X     DOI : 10.28986/jtaken
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara with registered number ISSN 2460-3937 (print), ISSN 2549-452X (online) is a scientific journal published by Directorate of Research and Development, The Audit Board of Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI). This journal was first published in 2015 and associated with Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (IAI).Each submitted article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers. This journal publishes two numbers in one volume each year, with 5 articles in each number. This journal has been accredited by the Directorate General for Research Strengthening and Development, the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (Peringkat 2) since year 2016 to 2020 according to the decree No. 21/E/KPT/2018.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue " 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016" : 6 Documents clear
Volume 2, Nomor 2, Desember 2016 (Full) TAKEN, Jurnal
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (11425.519 KB)

Abstract

this edition is concict of 5 articles
ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI TRANSFORMASI KAPABILITAS ORGANISASI DAN PERAN BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN RI Pramono, Agus Joko
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2538.408 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v2i2.63

Abstract

This study is aimed to study the influencing factors of the Audit Board of Republic Indonesia’s roles and capabilities transformation to meet the national development goals. This study use a qualitative approach with Analytic Network Process (ANP) method, to map out the interrelated factors of nodes within 3 clusters, which are the external, internal, and supporting factors. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted to design a Framework Analysis. The participants of the FGD were BPK RI officials and its stakeholders including relevant external experts. The FGD has made a quantification framework as an ideal approach to use for data processing on software superdecisions. This process has brought about the priorities as follows: external stakeholder engagement, leadership and governance system, communication and the management of information system. The research has found out that the most significant and urgent factor is the concern of, and support from, the external stakeholders for BPK RI. Therefore, BPK RI has to design a strategy and communication program that can effectively improve the external support and concern. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap transformasi kapabilitas dan peran Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode Analytic Network Process (ANP) untuk mendapatkan hubungan antar node dalam 3 cluster (faktor eksternal, internal dan penunjang) yang bersifat network. Framework analysis disusun melalui FGD para pakar dari eksternal dan internal BPK RI. Kuantifikasi framework dihasilkan dari FGD para pakar internal BPK RI. Olah data pada software superdecisions menghasilkan prioritas-prioritas sebagai berikut: faktor eksternal prioritasnya Stakeholders Engagement; faktor internal prioritasnya Kepemimpinan dan Sistem Tata Kelola; faktor penunjang prioritasnya Komunikasi dan Sistem Informasi Manajemen.  Berdasarkan hasil kajian ini diketahui bahwa hal paling penting dan mendesak adalah adanya kepedulian dan dukungan dari stakeholders eksternal terhadap BPK RI sehingga perlu segera disusun strategi, perencanaan, dan program komunikasi yang mampu secara efektif meningkatkan kepedulian dan dukungan stakeholders eksternal terhadap BPK RI.
THE EFFECT OF AUDIT FOLLOW-UP AND SIZES ON THE AUDIT QUALITY Mahpiansyah, Mahpiansyah
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (597.538 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v2i2.64

Abstract

This study examines the effect of local audit size and the audit feedback implementation to audit quality in Indonesia. Indonesian government has two audit institutions: external and internal audit. The audit feedback is a recommendation from the external audit to correct the audit subject’s financial report. This study analyzes panel data of 33 provinces from 2009 to 2013 from Audit Report Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) and Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), using OLS and TSLS. There are two data variables: the number data and the amount data. Both dependent and independent variables contain the number data and the amount data except the audit sizes variables. Audit feedback is divided into finished audit feedback and unfinished audit feedback while audit sizes are divided into three variables.The study finds that audit feedback and audit size are statistically significant to influence the audit findings and the internal audit sizes based on  the auditor’s number, the number of subject unit, and the number of provincial employees are statistically significant only to the number of audit findings. It implies that the number of audit feedback affects the audit findings as a whole without being disturbed by the nominal amount of audit feedback. There are no previous studies which measure the effect of audit feedback on audit quality. This paper added the important question on the relationship between audit sizes and the effectiveness of audit feedback on audit quality in government institutions especially in local governments. AbstrakPenelitian ini mengukur pengaruh ukuran audit dan tindak lanjut hasil audit terhadap kualitas audit di Indonesia. Pemerintah Indonesia memiliki dua institusi audit: eksternal dan internal audit. Tindak lanjut audit adalah perkembangan pelaksanaan rekomendasi audit dari audit eksternal untuk memperbaiki laporan keuangan auditee. Penelitian ini menganalisa data 33 provinsi dari tahun 2009 sampai dengan tahun 2013 dari Ikhtisar Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (ILHP BPK) dan Daerah Dalam Angka Badan Pusat Statistik (DDA BPS) menggunakan OLS dan TSLS. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa jumlah tindak lanjut hasil pemeriksaan dan ukuran audit berpengaruh signifikan terhadap temuan audit walaupun ukuran audit yang didasarkan pada jumlah internal auditor, jumlah unit subyek audit dan jumlah pegawai provinsi hanya berpengaruh signifikan terhadap jumlah temuan audit. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa jumlah tindak lanjut audit secara keseluruhan mempengaruhi temuan audit tanpa terganggu dengan nominal tindak lanjut audit. Belum ada penelitian sebelumnya yang mengukur pengaruh dari tindak lanjut audit terhadap kualitas audit. Penelitian ini menambahkan pertanyaan penting mengenai hubungan antara ukuran audit dan efektivitas tindak lanjut audit pada kualitas audit di institusi pemerintah khususnya pemerintah daerah.
EVALUASI ATAS IMPLEMENTASI APLIKASI SISTEM AKUNTANSI INSTANSI BASIS AKRUAL (SAIBA) PADA MITRA KERJA KPPN GORONTALO DAN MARISA Iskandar, Azwar; Amriani, Tenry Nur; Subekan, Achmat
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1788.534 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v2i2.65

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the success of accrual basic application system (SAIBA) implementation based on user perception with DeLone & McLean (DM) Information System (IS) Success Model Approach. The data used are primary and secondary data. Primary data gathered through questionnaires distributed to respondents while secondary data gathered from other institutions such as Directorate General of Budget, Directorate General of Treasury, and Treasury Office of Gorontalo and Marisa. This model uses six variables which are system quality, information quality, user satisfaction, use, individual impact and organizational impact. This research empirically showed that the accrual basic application system (SAIBA) currently implementated not successfully running yet based on all Delone and McLean’s success measurement criterias.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi sejauh mana keberhasilan implementasi aplikasi SAIBA yang telah berjalan selama ini berdasarkan sudut pandang pengguna (user) dengan menggunakan pendekatan Delone & McLean Information System Success Model. Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berasal dari data primer dan data sekunder. Data primer berupa data yang diperoleh langsung dari responden melalui kuesioner yang dibagikan. Sedangkan data sekunder adalah data yang diperoleh dan disajikan oleh pihak-pihak lainnya seperti Direktorat Jenderal Anggaran Kementerian Keuangan, Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharan Negara Kementerian Keuangan, dan Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara (KPPN) Gorontalo dan Marisa. Model ini menggunakan enam variabel pengukuran yaitu  kualitas  sistem (system quality), kualitas informasi (information quality), kepuasan pengguna (user satisfaction), penggunaan sistem (use), dampak individu (individual impact) dan dampak organisasi  (organizational impact). Penelitian membuktikan secara empiris bahwa implementasi aplikasi SAIBA belum berjalan sukses berdasarkan kriteria pengukuran sesuai model kesuksesan DeLone dan McLean  (1992).
DOES THE ROTATION OF HEAD OF AUDIT OFFICE ACROSS OFFICES IMPACT AUDIT QUALITY? STUDY CASE OF THE AUDIT BOARD OF REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Komalasari, Nurul
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (610.579 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v2i2.61

Abstract

 This study examines the effect of head of audit office rotation on auditing quality. This study is motivated by two propositions in private sector auditing. First, that audit partners from larger audit offices are argued to be more experienced compared with audit partners from smaller offices. Second, the audit partners from larger audit offices also argued to be more capable in handling the rotation challenges. This study aimed to examine these propositions in public sector setting by using the Supreme Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK) as a case study, where the head of representative office as the audit partner equivalent. This study tested these propositions by examining audit quality across BPK’s representative audit office sizes and the effect of rotation and types of rotation of the head of the representative audit office on audit quality. This study used the number of audit findings in the financial audit reports as the proxy of audit quality. This study found that audit quality varies across office sizes in the BPK, where the larger representative offices tend to have a better audit quality. This study also found that the rotation of the head of the audit office is negatively associated with audit quality. Lastly, this study found that the negative effect of rotation is caused by the negative effect of changes in the office sizes, which outweigh the positive effect of rotation. AbstrakPenelitian ini menguji dua argumen dalam konteks audit sektor swasta. Pertama audit partner dari kantor audit yang lebih besar dianggap memiliki kemampuan dan pengalaman audit yang lebih baik dari audit partner dari kantor audit yang lebih kecil. Kedua, audit partner dari kantor audit yang lebih besar juga dianggap lebih mampu menghadapi tantangan rotasi. Penelitian ini menguji kedua proposisi ini dalam konteks audit sektor publik menggunakan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia sebagai studi kasus. Penelitian ini untuk menguji kedua proposisi tersebut dengan meneliti kualitas audit antar kantor perwakilan BPK, efek dari rotasi dan tipe rotasi kepala perwakilan BPK terhadap kualitas audit, dengan menempatkan kepala kantor perwakilan BPK sebagai ekuivalensi dari audit partner pada sektor swasta. Penelitian ini menggunakan jumlah temuan audit dalam laporan audit atas laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah sebagai pendekatan  ukuran atas kualitas audit. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa terdapat kesenjangan kualitas audit antar kantor perwakilan dengan kecenderungan kantor perwakilan yang memiliki entitas audit yang lebih banyak akan memiliki kualitas audit yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan kantor perwakilan dengan entitas audit yang lebih sedikit. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa rotasi kepala kantor perwakilan berdampak negatif terhadap kualitas audit. Lebih jauh, hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dampak negatif tersebut disebabkan oleh dampak negatif perubahan ukuran kantor perwakilan, yang lebih besar dari dampak positif rotasi itu sendiri. 
MENGUKUR KESUKSESAN SISTEM AKUNTANSI INSTANSI BASIS AKRUAL (SAIBA) MENGGUNAKAN MODEL DeLONE & McLEAN Noviyanti, Noviyanti
Jurnal Tata Kelola & Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016
Publisher : Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (956.216 KB) | DOI: 10.28986/jtaken.v2i2.62

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the user’s perception of Accrual Basis Institution Accounting System  (SAIBA) in the ministry/agency in the first year of implementation of accrual-based government’s financial statements. Updated D & M IS Success Model is used to assess the success of SAIBA as a mandatory system in Indonesian Government Accounting. Respondents are operators of Institution Accounting System (SAI) in the ministries/agencies, who are joining the Workshop on Preparation and Study of Financial Statements at Pusdiklat Anggaran dan Perbendaharaan  Bogor in November 2015  and selected using purposive sampling method. The Primary data were obtained through questionnaires that were collected from 204 respondents, which were then analyzed using structural equation modeling. This study found that SAIBA can be categorized as a successful information for each dimension of success in the Updated D&M IS Success Model. Respondents assessed the system quality, the information quality and service quality of SAIBA tend to be good. However, respondents indicated the use of SAIBA has no significant effect on user satisfaction, in contrast to the others constructs relationships, the system quality, the information quality and service quality of SAIBA with net benefit and its reciprocal proved to be significant impact.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JTAKEN Vol. 9 No. 1 June 2023 JTAKEN 2023: Article in Press 2022: JTAKEN Vol. 8 No. 2 December 2022 2022: JTAKEN Vol. 8 No. 1 June 2022 2021: JTAKEN Vol. 7 No. 2 December 2021 2021: JTAKEN Vol. 7 No. 1 June 2021 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 2 December 2020 2020: JTAKEN Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2020 2019: JTAKEN Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2019 2019: JTAKEN Vol. 5 No. 1 June 2019 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 2 December 2018 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 2 Desember 2018 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 1 Juni 2018 2018: JTAKEN Vol. 4 No. 1 June 2018 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2017 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 2 Desember 2017 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 1 Juni 2017 2017: JTAKEN Vol. 3 No. 1 June 2017 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2016 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2016 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 1 June 2016 2016: JTAKEN Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2016 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2015 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 2 December 2015 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 July 2015 2015: JTAKEN Vol. 1 No. 1 Juli 2015 More Issue